Thursday, September 23, 2010

Golf Ball Cat Scratcher

September 17, 2010

Golf Ball Cat Scratcher


Ridiculous Golf Item of the Week

Posted By The Golf Blogger Related Entries
Golf Ball Cat Scratcher | Golf Ball Cat Scratcher | Golf Ball Cat Scratcher | Golf Ball Cat Scratcher Golf Blog Search Engine
Didn't find what you wanted? Search 40 other golf blogs with GolfBlogger's Exclusive Golf Blog Search Engine

Legal Information, Privacy Policy, Comment Policy and Disclaimers


View the original article here

Betting Odds To Win the 2010 Tour Championship Sept 20

September 20, 2010

Heading into the Tour Championship, the odds to win are substantially unchanged from what they were a week ago. Mickelson is favored for a win, with Stricker, Kuchar, Dustin Johnson, Casey and Furyk following. I’m convinced it’ll be either Kuchar or Johnson, since Phil really has not shown championship form in some months.  A logical argument also can be made that Paul Casey is the best golfer on the planet at this moment, and thus should be favored in this event.

What a great irony it would be for Casey to win the Tour Championship and walk home ten million dollars richer after having been left off the European Ryder Cup Team.

Matt Kuchar,, on the other hand, is my personal favorite for the event. I’ve thought for some time now that he has all the makings of a superstar. He’s got the skill—and the charisma—to be the new face of the PGA Tour. If only he ... and others ... were to work as hard as Phil at winning over crowds.

I’m impressed that Dustin Johnson still has his game intact after two soul crushing losses at Majors this year. A lesser mind would be destroyed. But Johnson seems somehow made of different stuff. No one should surprised if Johnson would pull out a Tour Championship. Even ten Tour Championships wouldn’t add up to one Major (to the chagrin, I am sure, of the Tour), but it wouldn’t be a consolation prize.

Stricker, Furyk, Goosen and Els are others you can’t count out, but would not be nearly as interesting. And interesting is what the Tour needs right now.

Complete odds are below, courtesy of Bodog.Com, the world’s largest betting destination.

Betting Odds To win The Tour ChampionshipPosted By The Golf Blogger Related Entries
Betting Odds To Win the 2010 Tour Championship Sept 20 | Betting Odds To Win the 2010 Tour Championship Sept 20 | Betting Odds To Win the 2010 Tour Championship Sept 20 | Betting Odds To Win the 2010 Tour Championship Sept 20 Golf Blog Search Engine
Didn't find what you wanted? Search 40 other golf blogs with GolfBlogger's Exclusive Golf Blog Search Engine

Legal Information, Privacy Policy, Comment Policy and Disclaimers


View the original article here

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

Golfweek’s Top College Golf Courses

September 20, 2010

Golfweek has its list of top college golf courses. Two of them are the University of Michigan Golf Course (number 12) and the University of Michigan’s Radrick Farms golf course (number 16). I’m surprised that Michigan State’s Forest Akers didn’t make the cut—it’s every bit as nice as Radrick Farms, although much more heavily played. Radrick is a semi-private course for University staff and alumni only, while Forest Akers is open just about everyone (as near as I can tell ... I just walked on one day with no tee time or credentials). Forest Akers is a bit more beaten up at any time than Radrick.

I’ve played four Big Ten courses—the two Michigan Courses, Forest Akers and Indiana University’s home course. The Ohio State University’s Scarlet is next on my list. What I’d really like to do is to play it on October 10 of this year on my way back from a football game in Morgantown, WV. I wonder if anyone out there can hook me up ...

Posted By The Golf Blogger Related Entries
Golfweek’s Top College Golf Courses | Golfweek’s Top College Golf Courses | Golfweek’s Top College Golf Courses | Golfweek’s Top College Golf Courses Golf Blog Search Engine
Didn't find what you wanted? Search 40 other golf blogs with GolfBlogger's Exclusive Golf Blog Search Engine

Legal Information, Privacy Policy, Comment Policy and Disclaimers


View the original article here

Pinemeadow ZR1 Mark II Irons

September 16, 2010

Pinemeadow Golf ZR 1 Mark II Irons

Pinemeadow says that its ZR1 Mark II Irons are designed to match the performance of Ping’s G15s at a fraction of the price:

The ZR1 Mark II iron set follows in the footsteps of its predecessors—being an ultra-forgiving iron for golfers of all skill levels. These clubs feature a deep cavity, lower center of gravity and lower back weight which combine for a high launch and oversize sweet spot.

The higher MOI reduces twisting of the face on miss-hits, resulting in a straighter shot. You will instantly notice better results in the accuracy of your iron play due to the fact that there is more room for error.

The design of these clubs feature a wide sole, deep dish cavity and elongated face. With a lower center of gravity, these irons yield a higher launch angle, softer shot and more forgiving play. If you are tired of playing an older set with out-dated technology, replace your irons with the our ZR1 Mark II set for an immediate difference.

They’re priced at $149 for the set. And they come with a 100%, 30 Day satisfaction guarantee as well as a one year warranty.

This wouldn’t be a bad way to get an extra set to keep at the cottage.

Posted By The Golf Blogger Related Entries
Pinemeadow ZR1 Mark II Irons | Pinemeadow ZR1 Mark II Irons | Pinemeadow ZR1 Mark II Irons | Pinemeadow ZR1 Mark II Irons Golf Blog Search Engine
Didn't find what you wanted? Search 40 other golf blogs with GolfBlogger's Exclusive Golf Blog Search Engine

Legal Information, Privacy Policy, Comment Policy and Disclaimers


View the original article here

Mental Mondays: Pick A Target

On every shot, be certain to pick a target. If you do not have a target, you can be absolutely sure that you will not hit it. Failing to aim at a specific location no doubt accounts for why—even on the widest fairways, and with the largest of greens—so many amateurs spray the ball wildly.

I once read a story in which Ben Hogan asked a caddy where he should aim on his tee shot. The caddy pointed out a couple of trees in the distance. “Aim for those trees,” he said. “Which one?” the Hawk asked.

Hogan knew that aiming in a general direction, rather than at a precise target, was asking for trouble. I’m surprised he didn’t ask “which branch.” The Hawk was nothing if not precise.

Imitate the Hawk by choosing a precise target on every shot. Don’t just aim “at the middle of the fairway” or “at the green.”  If you’re a high handicapper, you’re already missing a lot of fairways and greens, so clearly aiming at them isn’t doing the job.

For full tee shots, pick a spot in the fairway defined by a shadow, or an off-colored patch of grass. Then pick a smaller portion of that area. Divide again if possible. That’s your target.

On approach shots, don’t automatically choose the flag as your target. If you actually land the ball on target, it’s going to release and roll to the back of the green away from the flag. And too often, the flag is in a sucker position.

Pay close attention to the next televised PGA Tour event. Notice how often the players land the ball in a spot away from the hole, only to have it roll to within inches. It’s no accident. They were aiming for that precise spot, knowing it would roll from there.

Just as with a shot from the tee box, on approach shots, you should choose as narrowly defined a target as possible. Pick a mark if possible; otherwise, focus on a spot and burn its location into your brain.

Picking a target is just as important around the green as it is from the tee box or fairway. It’s also a easier because you’re a lot closer. Aim for a dent, or even a recognizable blade of grass at the location where you want the ball to land and begin its roll toward the hole.

Having a precise target helps your game on several levels. First, it’s necessary for proper alignment. You need to set up with your clubface on a line with the target, and your feet and shoulders parallel to that. None of that is possible without a precise target.

Second, having a precise target forces you to think about your goal. You’re not just chunking the ball down the course. You want to place each shot with an eye to the one after that. It’s not enough to land your tee shot somewhere in the fairway. You want it on the fairway in a position that maximizes your chances on the next swing.

And finally, on a more metaphysical level, focusing on a precise location allows your subconscious to come into play. Your body will try to do what the brain wants.


View the original article here

The GolfBlogger’s Guide To Match Play

The Ryder Cup in two weeks, and with it the usual annual confusion of American golf fans over what terms like Halve, All Square,  Dormie, 1-Up and scores like 3 and 2 or 5 and 4 mean.

American golf fans are used to what is known as “stroke play.” In stroke play, golfers play a set number of holes—and the number of holes is known from the beginning—and the player with the lowest combined total score wins.

Not so in Match Play. In that format, the golfers are pitted against each other in a mano-a-mano format. In match play, players are concerned—not with the field—but with beating the player they are playing with.

The most confusing part of Match Play is in the scoring. Each hole in a Match is a separate event, and is taken in isolation. The player who finishes the hole in the fewest strokes wins the hole. The player who wins the most holes out of eighteen wins the match.

The hole-by-hole format means that it’s possible (and probable) that one player will get far enough ahead that the other has no chance of winning. For example, if Tiger and Phil finish the 16th hole, and Woods has won three more than Phil, there is no need to continue. At best, Phil could win more holes, and still would be one hole down to Woods. So the match is called at 16. The final result would be Woods 3 and 2. That means that Woods won because he was up by three holes, with two holes left.

The scoring system in match play has some peculiar terminology. Match play results are reported by how many more (or fewer) holes a player has won, along with the number of holes left. Suppose that, after ten holes, Tiger has won six holes, and Phil has won four. The score is reported as Tiger being two up through 10. At the same time, Phil is two-down through 10. If both players have won the same number of holes, the score would be reported as “All Square Through 10.”

If a player wins 1-up, that means that the match has gone to 18 holes. The last hole was played either because the match was all square after 17, or because a player was only 1 up, and the other player could have made the match All Square on the final hole.

The term “Halve” is used when players tie on an individual hole. However, because tied holes are not counted in scoring an individual match, you’ll never see a score like Woods 3 1/2 Mickelson 1 1/2.

This also explains why there will often be a result where the holes just don’t add up. Tiger could win four holes, Phil win three and they could tie the other 11. If you just added up the number of holes won, it would look like they didn’t play a full match.

A “Dormie” is when one player is up by the exact number of holes left in the match. At this point, the best the opponent can do is to tie. So, if Woods and Mickelson were on the 16th tee, and Woods was 3-Up, the match is Dormie. The best Phil can do is to win the final three holes (16, 17 and 18) and make things All Square.

One seemingly strange score occurs when a player wins 5 and 3. On the surface, it looks as though the match should have ended with four holes to play, because one player was up by five. But what actually happened was that the match was Dormie with four to go. That is, Tiger was 4-Up on the 15th tee (four holes to go). At this point, Phil can Halve the match by winning the final four holes. But Tiger wins the 15th, and the match is over. Woods wins by five, with three to go, or 5 and 3.

Another interesting aspect of Match Play is that the players do not have finish every hole. Consider the following situation: Phil hits a hole-in-one on a par three. Tiger hits the green within inches of the cup, but the ball does not go in. At this point, there is no need for Woods to finish the hole, and he will concede to Mickelson. Even if Woods finishes with a birdie, he still has lost the hole. And there is no need to see if Woods can make the putt because unlike Stroke Play, the score does not carry over to the next hole.

Similarly, players often will “concede” a stroke. This usually happens on a short putt. For example, if Mickelson knows that Woods is going to make the tap-in, he might grant “gimmie.” The real question for that hole is whether Phil can make 12 footer to win the hole, or if he two putts for a halve.

There are also a couple of other major rules differences in Match Play. For example, in Stoke Play, if you play out of order, it’s just a breach of etiquette. But in Match Play, your opponent can force you to replay the shot.

The other major changes generally have to do with the penalty for breach of rules. In Stroke play, most of the penalties involve the addition of strokes. In Match Play, the rules violations generally involve the automatic loss of the hole.

For my money, match play is the most exciting form of golf. But you don’t see a lot of it on television because it’s unpredictable. Individual matches can end quite suddenly, because you don’t have to play all the holes to determine a winner. For that matter, you don’t even have to finish every hole. A network could schedule three hours for a match, only to have one player win the first ten holes. The match would be over, and the network still would have an hour of programming to fill.

Television also hates match play because each match is a one-and-done. The winner continues on, and the loser goes home. This means that it is entirely possible for the matches on the weekend—when television viewership is highest—to be devoid of the stars. In match play, one bad round means that you are done. In Stroke play, you can have a bad round and still come back the next day, have a good round and make the cut.


View the original article here

Sam Snead On Overswinging

September 19, 2010

My golf pro said earlier this summer that one of my major swing faults is that I take the club too far back. I’ve been working on a three quarters swing and thought that this Sam Snead video was pretty illustrative of the issue.

I’m not sure I’m ready to play in bare feet, though.

Posted By The Golf Blogger Related Entries

Golf Blog Search Engine
Didn't find what you wanted? Search 40 other golf blogs with GolfBlogger's Exclusive Golf Blog Search Engine

Legal Information, Privacy Policy, Comment Policy and Disclaimers


View the original article here

TRUE Linkswear start Tour Golf Shoe

The exporter's true market into the new shoe Linkswear Ryan Moore already satisfied customers.


 Every so often, we cover new companies that might not be all "Cup of tea," the lack of a better term products. When you step back and look at it from the perspective of wider, not all products such as golf? We all play the same ball or the same irons, or use the same clothes? Of course not.That is only one game that we love an individual in several areas. We have the option to further customize the select devices and, in particular, their clothing, ourselves and our people in such a way that our uniform entry you want to set up other sports footwear, cannot be expressed.


PGA Tour clear examples of this is Ryan Moore, who has a style is certainly one of the most talked about. New Moore's sartorial choices golf shoes shoes true linkswear onwards. Dallas-based company is made up of lovers who are really passionate about their products.In fact, any description of the company is obliged to work to play 18 holes every week, in their name product testing. Say that I am jealous is incredible to be defined. However, sufficient groveling my envy, let's take a look at the new shoes from true Linkswear.

TRUE Tour shoes were designed in four key ideas in mind. First and foremost for shoe was going to be nice.Since the shoe is intended to be the first hybrid golf shoe that has elapsed since the on or off, had to be nice. Minuscule 11 ounces, weighing, they surely points to another self-imposed demand. Although other footwear weigh approximately 18 ounces at least TRUE wishes to their shoes and as lightweight minimalist. They shall seek to provide their customers with mainly case actually as Hiroshima Golf experience.


SET TO TRUE, THE guys wanted to feel that you are familiar with the course than ever before at the same time on a loose robe of most exquisite their shoes. this new shoe keep each run, the player's foot slightly less than 10 mm from the ground level.These 10 mm is made up of "Ergo-traction company" only 4 mm tread, 2.5 mm and 3 mm outer sock liner. Shoe was designed without a tray that is usually used to add weight, torsional resistance and overall height. Product testers to him, this improves their ability to "read green, it seems, lies and feel the sand bunkers texture".


TRUE Linkswear - White Saddle


Hiroshima environment that increases the surface area of the contact is connected to the previously mentioned "ergo-Traction outsole gives excellent grip walking and swinging where weather conditions, without any form of spikes. The "Ergo-Traction outsole allows you to interact with the" foot ground natural manner, the traction unit compared to bars and knobs and spikes.


TRUE Linkswear


Tour of the shoe is made up of whole grain leather upper 360 ° shielded from outlast assemblies and Water Proof moisture with integrated language and sockliner helps stability and comfort. Outlast sockliner and smell allows you to also protect the feet cool by allowing ventilation and temperature regulation in the framework of the shoe to restrictive. In addition to contributing to the logical memory foam with the heel comfort is fashionable, which connect to on foot around the shape, and a more custom whenever or placed. Perhaps you have seen the memory foam beds in ads?Imagine a sort-of-the-art amenities, such as your legs to walk the course.


TRUE Linkswear - Black


As I mentioned, true already has one very satisfied customer PGA Tour player Ryan Moore, who has been sporting TRUE tour shoe back in may, the Colonial.



TRUE linkswear shoes I have comfort, because they've never worn the lightest and most comfortable shoes.I feel the player and each golf-game occur through green teebox part depends on the close relationship to it.These shoes be so that you have never felt before.I was so excited to learn golf shoe concept, and when I finally wear shoes for the first time, I knew that I wanted to use them for a tour. En can expect that feeling to share with you.


Moore was acquired by the company as soon as the shoes will see for the first time; All up-and-coming golf equipment company Is, of course, think twice to players such as Ryan Moore on a loose robe of most exquisite products. Ryan itself was in fact a hand in the design of the shoe by providing feedback about the real-world experience.


TRUE Linkswear - Black


TRUE: 's website has recently administrative authorities and the shoes are now available for pre-order and sometimes in October expected delivery date. Although originally true linkswear price Tours were placed $ 189, true listened to the feedback of prospects and the price of the returned $ 159. I would like to see some major manufacturers as customers listen to Four different color variations! are initially available, including:

TRUE Original Black and white Upper SoleBlack black Sole black and red with Black StitchingClassic white Upper saddle white saddle Black SoleWhite, with white Sole White

If you want to learn more about the company or true linkswear Tour footwear, you can check out their blog with TRUE Chairman Heikki Rigg shall be updated at least once a week at our upcoming. Find an overview of the TRUE Tour shoes.